From the archive
Report Alleges Qatar Foundation's Extensive Influence on US Education System
A report alleges Qatar Foundation International invested over $65 million in US education programs, influencing curriculum and content about the Middle…
The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP) recently published a new report documenting the extensive role of Qatar Foundation International in the United States education system. The report states that Qatar Foundation International invested more than $65 million into hundreds of education programs across the United States, raising concerns about the nature and impact of this foreign funding. According to the report, teaching materials used in some of these programs replaced Israel with 'Palestine' on maps, a contentious alteration that has drawn significant scrutiny.
Report Details Funding and Reach
The full report, titled 'Institutional Capture: Qatar Foundation International and the Use of Soft Power to Reshape the US Education System,' details significant financial contributions to American education. It identifies more than $65 million in funding allocated to over 220 programs between 2009 and 2025. This substantial financial support extended across various educational levels and initiatives within the United States, demonstrating a wide-ranging strategy to engage with educational institutions and curricula.
These programs had a broad reach, impacting elementary schools, high schools, and prominent universities across the nation. The funding also supported teacher training initiatives and nationwide networks for educators, indicating a full engagement strategy within the US education system. The scope of these endeavors suggests an effort to influence educational content and pedagogical approaches at multiple tiers, from foundational learning to advanced academic research. Through these various channels, Qatar Foundation International aimed to shape perspectives and knowledge concerning the Middle East among American students and educators.
Qatar Foundation International also engaged in cooperative efforts with federally funded US Middle East studies centers. These collaborations involved universities such as Duke University, the University of North Carolina, and the University of Texas at Austin. These partnerships placed Qatar Foundation International within established academic frameworks that receive US government support, further extending its reach into higher education and specialized academic fields. The report notes that these centers operate under the US government's Title VI program, which provides funding for research and study of international languages and regions, thereby integrating Qatar Foundation International's influence into publicly supported academic endeavors.
Specific Instances of Influence
According to the ISGAP report, Qatar Foundation International exerted influence over teaching materials, teacher training, and content regarding the Middle East. The foundation trained educators in major U.S. Cities through multiyear educational leadership programs, which were designed to equip teachers with specific pedagogical tools and perspectives. These programs included study trips to Doha, Qatar, for participating teachers, offering them direct exposure to the region and the foundation's viewpoints. The report alleges that the foundation influenced content presented at national conferences for social studies educators through speakers it had trained, thereby disseminating its perspectives to a broader professional audience.
One specific instance cited in the report involves a public school in New York that received funding from Qatar Foundation International. This school was reportedly found to be using teaching materials where Israel was omitted from maps and replaced by "Palestine." This particular finding has raised serious questions about the impartiality and accuracy of the educational content being distributed to American students. The report emphasizes that such alterations to geographical and political representations can have a significant impact on students' understanding of global affairs.
Separately, Brown University's Choices Program, which distributed educational materials to more than 8,000 schools and reached 1 million students nationwide, was recently canceled. The program, which provided teaching materials on international relations and current events, was a significant source of content for a broad student base across the United States. The cancellation marks the end of a long-standing initiative that had considerable reach within the American education system. The Choices Program had previously been the subject of an ISGAP report in 2015, which raised concerns about its content and funding sources.
Congressional and Institutional Reactions
The incident involving the New York public school and the altered maps prompted a formal congressional investigation, showing the gravity with which federal lawmakers view such issues. The report's findings have sparked sharp reactions from members of Congress from both parties, who have collectively called for increased oversight, transparency, and federal scrutiny of foreign funding in the US education system. Lawmakers expressed concerns about the potential for foreign influence to undermine educational integrity and shape narratives in a manner inconsistent with American values.
The detailed documentation within the ISGAP report has ignited a broader debate about the mechanisms through which foreign entities can impact educational curricula and teacher training in the United States. The calls for greater transparency are aimed at ensuring that educational institutions are fully aware of the sources and intentions behind foreign donations and partnerships. Federal scrutiny is expected to focus on the adequacy of existing regulations and the enforcement of disclosure requirements for foreign gifts and contracts to US academic institutions, particularly under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act. The report serves as a critical document for policymakers and educators alike, noting the need for vigilance in safeguarding the independence and integrity of the American education system against undue foreign influence.